Total average


Learning Materials ( 62.5 )
Learning Activities ( 40.5 )
Blackboard Management ( 50 )
Course Content ( 62.5 )
Course Structure ( 40 )
Contact Availability ( 47.5 )
Course Difficulty ( 40 )

Reviews (2)

GEOS3103 – Progress in Geography 64.0

Interesting topics presented each week,however, the weekly readings can be quite challenging and technical.
While the almost weekly essays eliminate any final exams or substantial essays, they can be very overwhelming. But I did find myself putting in minimal effort and still achieving 6/7's for each one so that is definitely a positive. My only complaint would have to be the inconsistent expectations throughout the semester. The structure of the essays would be changed or the requirements changed which became a bit difficult to respond to when you became accustomed to writing a certain way.

Overall. Scott was a very engaging lecturer and provided decent feedback on the essays, and no assessment was oveely challenging to complete.

Semester taken

Semester 1 - 2017

Your program/major


Is lecture attendance necessary?


Is the textbook necessary?

No textbook

  • No exam/Major essay
  • Interesting content
  • Good marking
  • Technical readings
  • Weekly assessment can be intense
Posted on January 26, 2019 10:03 am
GEOS3103 – Progress in Geography 34.0

Hello! Dearest Geographers, gather 'round the camp fire or climate change model and let me tell you the tale of how much I hate GEOS3103, semester 1, 2016.

1. I like surprises as much as the next person, but the inconsistency from week to week in this course was more than a surprise 21st at your mum's house. It's like that huge cramp your anus gets when you're on the toilet. But you accept it, and go with the flow.

You won't have the same lecturer every week, an advantage that has fallen short.

3. Now, week 4 really got my goat. Can I just say that the lecturer Jonathon Aitchison will not be on my list of people who I want to dine with when I'm in heaven or hell. He is condescending and unhelpful. His feedback on papers is opaque and rudiment. Unless I want to seem hypercritical, I better give an example. His critique for my week 4 paper had comments like 'NO!' and 'This makes little if any sense'. I acknowledge my writing is sometimes bewildering, but a marker's job is meant to unpack what the student has done i.e. their approach, and correcting that direction where need be. I also will add, without hesitation, and for the purpose of adding honesty to purify my agenda, that my effort for these weekly papers is terrible. But still, you're a marker, do your job.

Also Mr Aitchison gave a week's notice for a group assignment that was NOT stated in the ECP... I love nothing more than only a week to communicate with people who don't write back. (If I wanted to be ignored I'd text that guy who I am in love with but who does not reciprocate my feelings.) Our group was ridiculed in front of the whole class at the end of said group presentation. The sweet smell of humiliation. Did I mention that he gave us no foundation for that weekly reading, no pre-posted lecture to grapple what his intentions were. It is a shame, because that week's topic about other planets and geomorphology was interesting.

4. So, 1000 word, weekly papers... I want to complain, but I am a third year, I should be doing the work. It's still intense though and does not cater to those who don't learn in this format.

5. The attempt to look at how, not what, geographers think fell short due to the chaotic nature of the course.

(Please omit any poorly executed grammar. I am rather angry about this course, also because of my unrequited love conundrum.)

Semester taken

Semester 1 - 2015

Your program/major


Is lecture attendance necessary?


Is the textbook necessary?

No textbook.

  • Some lecturers were great.
  • Interesting weekly topics.
  • Readings can be too technical.
  • 1, 000 words a week is intense.
Posted on April 2, 2016 3:37 pm

Submit your own review

Please make sure to read our Review Guidelines before posting a review.